Bruce Chapman, President of the Discovery Institute has an article that echoes much of my sentiment. So, to prevent exposure of the incapacity of their theory, what is the next test the Darwinists are going to come up with? Will it not be a religious test that explicitly examines supposed motives rather than evidence or [...]
Archive forJuly, 2005
DI also sees Darwinian Fizzbin
July 24th, 2005 | by teleologist | published in Darwinism, Intelligent Design | Leave A Comment »
Do We Have an Evolutionary Theory?
July 24th, 2005 | by teleologist | published in Biology, Darwinism | 3 Comments »
Here is a letter from the ever eloquent and outspoken Professor of Biology John A. Davison to Revista De Biologia. Do We Have an Evolutionary Theory? Dear Editors, The word theory has several definitions. To facilitate discussion I am going to define theory as follows. A theory sensu strictu is an hypothesis which, having been [...]
Darwinists will be assimilated to service us!
July 23rd, 2005 | by teleologist | published in Darwinism, Intelligent Design | Leave A Comment »
Paul Nelson wrote a very telling entry in ID the Future on how ridiculous some Darwinists have become. Paul Nelson quoting Raff …let us not play into the hands of ID propagandists. For instance, be careful about using teleological words to describe biological entities in our teaching and writing. Calling cells “machines that do X,” [...]
Darwinian Fizzbin (The Third Revolution)
July 2nd, 2005 | by teleologist | published in Darwinism, Evolution | 3 Comments »
“That’s where Evo Devo comes in, attempting to explain a process through which a single- celled egg develops into a multibillion-celled animal, and why there are such deep connections among animals” Where do they all come from? So what is evolutionary developmental biology (evo-devo)? According to B. K. Hall professor of Biology “Evo-Devo opens the [...]