Monthly Archives: August 2005

Archive of posts published in the specified Month

Calling Darwin’s Bluff

Recently Dr. William Dembski wrote “Calling Dennett’s Bluff” http://www.uncommondescent.com/index.php/archives/282 Jonathan Witt wrote “Daniel Dennett’s Sham Science“, August 29, 2005 http://www.idthefuture.com/index.php?p=700 Others as well wrote related things, like: http://telicthoughts.com/?p=243 But here, I want to call your attention to another very common bluff that we…

The three monkeys of Dar-Win-Ism

<img border = "0" width="150" height="104" src="http://editorialcartoonists.com/CFC/thumbimage.cfm?id=4638" alt = "Cartoon by Gary Varvel, Intelligent Design" (click here to view) Gary VarvelIndianapolis StarAug 19, 2005 EditorialCartoonists.com The three monkeys of Dar-Win-Ism: Hear no Intelligent Design – See no Intelligent Design – Speak no Intelligent…

The Avalos’ Bash

Recent news on this case (Sept. 27, 2005): The Good Report of Guillermo Gonzalez, Author of The Privileged Planet The initial Evil Avalos’ bashings against Gonzalez declared: “We certainly don’t want to give the impression to the public that intelligent design is what…

Intelligent Design on Cable: Larry King and Bill O’Reilly

CNN Larry King Live Intelligent Design in American Classrooms? Aired August 23, 2005 – 21:00 ET http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0508/23/lkl.01.html http://www.uncommondescent.com/index.php/archives/262 Download and see the video of Larry King (CNN) with fellow Jay Richards. August 23, 2005 in Windows Media (Big file: 52.3MB, optimized for broadband)…

The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly

The Good : Intelligent Design has finally made it into the pop culture’s talking points as it was demonstrated in tonight’s TV show “Boston Legal”. The Bad : The writers of pop culture (not surprisingly) has taken the Darwinian propaganda line that ID…

Darwinian of the gaps

What is Darwinian of the gaps? Darwinists have declared Darwinian evolution as a well-tested theory. Indeed it has been so well tested that it should be considered as fact and not just a theory. Recently even Peter Ward the coauthor of Rare Earth…

Sternberg is right. However, OSC is closing his case for ‘technical’ reasons.

Yes, we read that Coddington (aka JAC) lied; yes, we read that Coddington’s evolutionist friends at Panda’sThumb and at NCSE lied as well (see that info in links below). The Smithsonian Institution indeed discriminated against Richard von Sternberg, as the inflammatory e-mails of…

Variation and Genetic Compatibility vs. Darwinism

Dear Reader, Do you think that people is not going to find out sooner or later the truth that lies behind the lies sold as a macroevolutionary ‘speciation‘? Will evolutionism try to strip out the logic inferences and rights of “Intelligent Design” to…

Challenging Darwinian Evolution

Darwinism has grown and blossomed into a cultish religion. Anyone challenging Darwinian evolution will be demonized and punished. The bombastic Darwinian rhetoric says that Darwinians are not against questions of their theory. Darwinians will cite examples of certain questions of the evolutionary mechanism.…

Dembski respond to Pinker

Brilliant response Bill! BRAVO Specifically, Darwinists are poor scientists who have a habit of jumping to conclusions. Darwinians declared that 95% of our DNA are junk when they actually lack the understanding of how it works. Darwinians complains that certain biological systems cannot…