The current historical developments can not be excluded from the full picture. The new generation of scientists (and their parents) needs to be aware of the novel and refreshing “Critical Analysis of Evolution“.
This a vital and current scientific history worthy to be clearly presented.
Even it has been presented in Nature’s front page!
From Nature’s Cover:
“This journal contains material on evolution. Evolution by natural selection is a theory, not a fact. This material should be approached with an open mind, studied carefully and critically considered.”
Approved by the University Board of ______, 2006.
Just one example for all readers to see,
You can find how media reporters today are completely unable to differentiate between the design and the designer (i.e., The Abrams Report.
That deliberate blindness’ disease can be developed by blindly relying in the NCSE and its “missionary” Eugenie C. Scott et al). The facts: Eugenie C. Scott et al declared
“Steve, your article doesn’t mention intelligent design.”
To Eugenie C. Scott et al, Stephen C. Meyer answered,
“of course it does” she can’t tell me what was in my own article”
Abrams was stubbornly asking,
“Who is the intelligent designer? Who is the intelligent designer?”
While all that Intelligent Design does is to detect the signature of intelligence in nature!
Stephen C. Meyer declared:
“I personally do think that God created the world. But the reason that as a design theorist, we are careful not to say more than we can detect intelligence is not because we are trying to pull a sham or the wool over anyone’s eyes, we’re trying to be careful about what the evidence can establish and what it can’t. The argument for design is based on evidence and the evidence established an intelligent cause, but it can’t establish the identity of the intelligence.”
Abrams ended up this segment by declaring,
“by the way. Stephen Meyer, you’re a good sport”
So, I want to ask you, with the same insistence that we saw in the Abrams’ show,
“do you personally think that God created the world, as I do?”
If the answer is yes, do you agree with Stephen C. Meyer or with NCSE‘s Eugenie C. Scott, the “missionary” of “evolution”?
“Being a good sport” means acting in a way that meets certain high ethical standards. So,
“Scott, you are a bad sport”
Are evolutionists going to continue attempting to deny our people to know the full story?
Read by yourself the PDF full version of Meyer’s article , entitled:
Intelligent Design: The Origin Of Biological Information And The Higher Taxonomic Categories. By: Stephen C. Meyer. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington. August 4th, 2004.
This article includes the text directly discussing and trying to support design theory highlighted in red. This is primarily at the end of the article where Meyer lays out the case for intelligent design as a better explanation than Darwinian evolution.
Here is something else about Eugenie C. Scott, from Telic Thoughts.
Dear reader, support Intelligent Design in Dover, PA. We are for the freedom and progress in Science!