Skip to content

Teleological Blog

"Biologists must constantly keep in mind that what they see was not designed, but rather evolved." — Francis Crick

  • Evidence for Design
  • Atheism’s Trojan Horse
  • Darwinian Biases
  • teleologist’s theology
  • Toggle search form

KCFS supporter speaks his mind

Posted on August 2, 2006 By scordova 5 Comments on KCFS supporter speaks his mind

Top 10 Actions by new School Board

Now that the power has been won, it is time to execute Plan 666.

10. No religious paraphenalia allowed in public schools. Searches are to be performed at the school entrance.

9. Any appeal to God or any prayer offerred will result in immediate expulsion.

8. In order for students to pass biology, they must denounce YECism.

7. School on Sundays.

6. Free abortions by High School nurse.

5. Gay sensitive curriculum and Gay Bathrooms.

4. Don’t ask don’t tell drug policy.

3. End football programs and replace them with soccer.

2. New curriculum to include the study of the “FSM”.

1.Replace the symbol for a failing grade from “F” to “Dembski”.

Related posts:

DI also sees Darwinian Fizzbin
Santa vs Atheism
(Dis)Honest Science in Ohio
Darwinism

Post navigation

Previous Post: Allen MacNeill stands up for the rights of his pro-ID students
Next Post: Doubt and Certainty

Comments (5) on “KCFS supporter speaks his mind”

  1. Pingback: Telic Thoughts » A misleading post from a pro-ID blogger
  2. scordova says:
    August 2, 2006 at 3:30 pm

    I’m leaving the original title up so that people will understand what happened. So I will amend what I have already written by my comments here.

    If a politician had courted minority votes, and was later recorded making racist jokes, what would happen to his credibility. I think this poster is symbolic of what I perceive as a total charade by Darwin promoters that this is purely about science. For some of them, they just have contempt for what people like myself stand for.

    I have no problem with free speech. I would just prefer they drop the pretense that this is all about good science but rather just an expression of opposition for another culture.

  3. teleologist says:
    August 2, 2006 at 6:54 pm

    I completely agree with your comments at TT. It seems that Krauze might have jump the gun a bit in his chastisement of you. It was immediately obvious to anyone reading this list that it was meant as a joke. And second there is no indication that you were trying to imply that it was meant as a serious position from KCFS.

    I like you find it as a distorted repugnant caricature of people of faith. And you are also right; I would have preferred a more upfront criticism from dmvprof. Krauze’s criticism reminds me of racist jokes are much more sensitive to group that the joke was targeted. I have met “Whites” who have no problem with the “N-word” , even thought they claim that they don’t mean anything by it. I thought tolerance was supposed to understand the sensitivity of others that are different from you?

    I am not insinuating that Krauze is insensitive. I am just saying that Christians like us are more sensitive to these criticisms. I am sure Krauze intended to be judicious but in this case, IMHO, it was misapplied.

  4. scordova says:
    August 2, 2006 at 8:04 pm

    Thanks teleologist,

    I think Krauze may not be aware of the dynamics going on here in Evangelical USA”.

    When I said, “In fact, here is what one KCFS supporter is hoping will succeed instead:” that was a bit of hyperbole. But on the other token, the joke had an air of sincere hatred in it”.

    What at work here is not the converse of Forrest’s bogus “theocracy conspiracy” or “chicken littleism” . The desire to do harm is real. Within ID alone, the victims: Sternberg, Dembski, Crocker, Bryson, etc. The other side is willing to resort to the most unwholesome and unethical tactics to achieve its ends. They have a history of following through with their threats when they have the opportunity…

    Krauze doesn’t see the vandalism being committed against our IDEA club property or the fact I’m constantly trying to protect the identities of pro-ID biology students or post docs lest they get targeted. He doesn’t know that I meet professors and scientists at the universities with their necks on the line. This threat of harm is real, unlike the worries of theocracy which are totally bogus.

    I can appreciate he was trying to be fair minded to both sides. He is a good friend. And I hope he can appreciate my situation.

    Even in the USA we’re seeing punks burning innocent churches down for kicks. The threat of theocracy is bogus, but the threat of physical harm to the property, person, and livelihood of Christians is real and documented.
    I have no prejudice to atheists. It is well know my friendships with them help us to work together to promote ID (imagine that atheists teaming up with me).

    However, this situation is different. I sense intense hostility against Christians by dmvprof. dmvprof in other words showed his true colors and spoke his mind.

    That’s the kind of company KCFS Darwinists keep. I don’t know why the Christians among the KCFSers (Darwinist Jeremy Mohn) didn’t’ come forward and protest loudly. If someone makes a racist remark, they’re probably expelled from a message board. However, trashing of Christians at KCFS isn’t considered rude. Instead, Krebs condemns me and not dmvprof.

  5. inunison says:
    August 17, 2006 at 8:22 am

    This is no joke. If you lived in one of the former communist countries you would take this a bit more serious. Enjoy the freedom of religion, for now.

Comments are closed.

Recent Posts

  • Darwinism : Just Another Magic Show
  • Darwinian Evolution Means No Change Over Time
  • Review of The Reviews on Ham-Nye Debate
  • Ken Ham will debate Bill Nye. Why?
  • Darwin’s Other Doubt

Recent Comments

  • Darwinian Evolution Means No Change Over Time » Teleological Blog on Evidence for Design
  • teleologist on Review of The Reviews on Ham-Nye Debate
  • sosalty on Review of The Reviews on Ham-Nye Debate
  • The Anatomy of Darwinism (Part 2) » Teleological Blog on The Avalos’ Bash
  • teleologist on Review of The Reviews on Ham-Nye Debate

Archives

  • September 2016
  • February 2015
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • July 2013
  • January 2013
  • September 2012
  • May 2010
  • September 2009
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004

Categories

  • Atheism
  • Biology
  • blog specific issues
  • Creationism
  • Darwinism
  • Dstortions
  • Education
  • entertainment
  • Evolution
  • Holidays
  • Humor
  • Intelligent Design
  • Liberal-Humanism
  • OEC
  • Philosophy
  • Theology
  • Uncategorized
  • YEC

Meta

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Copyright © 2023 Teleological Blog.

Powered by PressBook WordPress theme