Monthly Archives: January 2007

Archive of posts published in the specified Month

Evolution Magic

The New Scientist had an article titled ” Review 2006: Evolution in action” last month. To be accurate, it should have been titled — ” Review 2006: Illusion in action” . Darwinists are masters at misdirection i.e., they are professional magicians. The only…

Darwinists have some gross people on their side

Eric Pianka and John Reid delight in the annihilation billions of humans. If such a large number of humans died, there would be a lot of corpses around. Not to worry, another Darwinist by the name of Beth Conklin has some words about…

Double Standard

Question: What do you call a person who hypothesizes an unseen intelligent being and searches outer space for confirming material evidence? Answer: A scientist. Question: What do you call a person who hypothesizes an unseen intelligent being and searches inner space for confirming…

Common descent vs Common design

Definitions: Common descent is the idea that two populations or species share a common ancestral species, and are both descended from that ancestor by normal processes of replication. This is a fairly commonplace notion. The theory of common descent states that all species…

The Darwinian Aquarium

I’ve been inspired by this UD post.

Spam Filtering Problem

Daron, and FYI for others, I’ve traced the filter problem to a link that you had in your post. The link points to the ARN article cached through google, titled “Evidence for Intelligent Design from Biochemistry” . I am still not sure if…

Does the Giraffe Really Have a Long Neck?

“Darwin’s primary interest [was] the modification of living forms under the selective influence of the environment”. Magnificent as his grasp of this aspect of biology is, it is counterbalanced by a curious lack of interest in the nature of the organism itself”. It…

Monkey Business

“We’ve heard that a million monkeys at a million keyboards could produce the complete works of Shakespeare; now, thanks to the Internet, we know that is not true.” Prof. Robert Wilensky

Intelligent design is a science, not a faith

A great article from the UK supporting ID. Buggs, who holds a DPhil in plant ecology and evolution from the University of Oxford and sits on the scientific panel of Truth in Science, Finally, Randerson claims that ID is “pure religion”. In fact,…

Torturing Muslims for Buddha

IMHO, Joy is one of the brightest minds I know among Internet personalities. Her latest post on “New Atheist” Sam Harris is spectacular. I will refrain from making any comments, just read it if you haven’t yet. What a great find!