Skip to content

Teleological Blog

"Biologists must constantly keep in mind that what they see was not designed, but rather evolved." — Francis Crick

  • Evidence for Design
  • Atheism’s Trojan Horse
  • Darwinian Biases
  • teleologist’s theology
  • Toggle search form

Author: teleologist

Darwinism : Just Another Magic Show

Posted on September 10, 2016 By teleologist No Comments on Darwinism : Just Another Magic Show

Is it so hard to do science without the obligatory infusion of Darwinian fairy tales into everything? Apparently so. Take a look at this quote from the journal Chemical Senses, From the evolutionary standpoint, the ability to taste starch or its oligomeric hydrolysis products would be highly adaptive, given their nutritional value. According to the…

Read More “Darwinism : Just Another Magic Show” »

Darwinism, Evolution

Darwinian Evolution Means No Change Over Time

Posted on February 13, 2015May 31, 2015 By teleologist No Comments on Darwinian Evolution Means No Change Over Time

Everyone agrees evolution is a fact if we define it as change over time. Darwinism on the other hand extends that change to common descent through novel mutations. But what happens when there is no novel mutations over billions of years, well that’s okay because that is also proof for Darwinian evolution. Say what?

“It seems astounding that life has not evolved for more than 2 billion years—nearly half the history of the Earth,” said J. William Schopf, a UCLA professor of earth, planetary and space sciences in the UCLA College who was the study’s lead author. “Given that evolution is a fact, this lack of evolution needs to be explained.”

Charles Darwin’s writings on evolution focused much more on species that had changed over time than on those that hadn’t. So how do scientists explain a species living for so long without evolving?

“The rule of biology is not to evolve unless the physical or biological environment changes, which is consistent with Darwin,” said Schopf, who also is director of UCLA’s Center for the Study of Evolution and the Origin of Life. The environment in which these microorganisms live has remained essentially unchanged for 3 billion years, he said.

I am sure prof. Schopf is looking at this purely from a scientific perspective and not based on his presupposition that evolution is a fact, and therefore some excuse explanation is needed for this lack of evolution (yes, that was a bit of sarcasm).

Read More “Darwinian Evolution Means No Change Over Time” »

Atheism, Biology, Darwinism, Evolution

Review of The Reviews on Ham-Nye Debate

Posted on February 8, 2014February 13, 2015 By teleologist 4 Comments on Review of The Reviews on Ham-Nye Debate

For the last couple of days there have been a number of post-debate analysis between Ham-Nye. Let me just say at the outset that I am not as negative on the debate as I am on the pro-Ham reviews of the debate. What I mean is that while I still don’t agree with Ham’s argument for creationism and I still don’t think this debate should have taken place. But he was only mildly derisive toward old earth creationists. And the aftermath could be worst if Nye was a better debater. On the other hand, I’ve noticed that most of the pro-Ham reviewers did not really get into the substance of the debate as to why Ham did so well. But they speak in generalities of how Ham is able to undauntingly contrast his Christian worldview against Nye’s atheist materialistic worldview. And that to them is considered a victory. Really? Who was even challenged by what the other side said? If you can’t even create a challenge for the opposition how can that be considered doing well. It would have been better for Ham to just hold a camp revival meeting and just proclaim the gospel maybe that would have been more fruitful.

Read More “Review of The Reviews on Ham-Nye Debate” »

Creationism, OEC, YEC

Ken Ham will debate Bill Nye. Why?

Posted on January 30, 2014January 30, 2014 By teleologist No Comments on Ken Ham will debate Bill Nye. Why?

The internet have been buzzing with news that Ken Ham will debate Bill Nye at the Creation Museum. Even someone that I ran into in the doctor’s office was talking about it. This to me is like a debate between obstinate arrogant blind faith vs. idiotic fairy tales. It is true I am an old…

Read More “Ken Ham will debate Bill Nye. Why?” »

Creationism, Darwinism, OEC, YEC

Darwin’s Other Doubt

Posted on July 29, 2013July 30, 2013 By teleologist No Comments on Darwin’s Other Doubt

That said, it occurred to me that Charles Darwin voiced a deeper doubt, of relevance to all of Meyer’s critics. In a letter to William Graham on July 3, 1881, Darwin wrote: Nevertheless you have expressed my inward conviction, though far more vividly and clearly than I could have done, that the Universe is not…

Read More “Darwin’s Other Doubt” »

Atheism, Darwinism, Evolution

Santa vs Atheism

Posted on January 31, 2013February 3, 2013 By teleologist No Comments on Santa vs Atheism

Michael Patton over at Parchment and Pen posted this comparison from the atheists to ridicule Christians. A Letter to (Some) Atheists I would like to offer my counter comparison based on their theme to make a counter-point. Santa vs Atheism

Atheism, Darwinism

Junk Darwinism Not Junk DNA

Posted on September 9, 2012 By teleologist No Comments on Junk Darwinism Not Junk DNA

An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome This is just one of many scientific papers that have come out as a result of the ENCODE (Encyclopedia of DNA Elements) project discovering functions in the “non-coding” region of human DNA. ID theorist have long disputed the Darwinian propaganda of 98% similarity of chimps…

Read More “Junk Darwinism Not Junk DNA” »

Biology, Darwinism, Evolution, Intelligent Design

Creation of a Bacterial Cell Controlled by a Chemically Synthesized Genome

Posted on May 21, 2010March 29, 2015 By teleologist 1 Comment on Creation of a Bacterial Cell Controlled by a Chemically Synthesized Genome

This post title was taken directly from the Sciencexpress research article title. Here are a few headlines from the popular press. 1st cell with synthetic genome — TheScientist J. Craig Venter Institute creates first synthetic life form — The Christian Science Monitor Scientists Create First Self-Replicating Synthetic Life — Wired I think the media is…

Read More “Creation of a Bacterial Cell Controlled by a Chemically Synthesized Genome” »

Biology, Dstortions

Darwin’s Dilemma

Posted on September 30, 2009 By teleologist

I am looking forward to watching Darwin’s Dilemma.

Biology, Darwinism, Evolution, Intelligent Design

How P.Z. Myers Does Science?

Posted on September 11, 2009 By teleologist

A few weeks ago PZ defended his religion of Darwinism in the post Darwin and the vermiform appendix. PZ Myers is a Darwinian Prior, who refuse to allow silly things like facts stand in the way of his worship of atheism. So when a lot of press starts to suggest evolution might be in error, PZ the Darwinian Prior, must spin the fairy tale once again.

Where they go awry, though, is in trying to pick a fight with a dead man, and making that the focus of their public relations. … Charles Darwin is dead. Your research can’t be very cogent if your approach to drum up interest is to dig up a 120-year-old corpse and kick it around; is there anyone alive who disagrees with you who can put up a more informative and entertaining struggle? What this does is pick this one fellow as a symbol of the whole edifice of evolutionary theory

I agree. Darwin is dead and no one should make him the symbol of the whole edifice of evolutionary fairy tale theory. I mean only a crazy person would make such a big deal about a dead guy right? A rational and smart scientist like PZ would never make such a big deal about a 120 year old corpse who does not have very cogent research to science, right? Hey, PZ do you know the Darwin corpse worshipper from Fairyngula who said this?

Get out and celebrate the 200th anniversary of the birth of one of the most important scientists of all time, Charles Darwin, and the 150th anniversary of the publication of one of the most important books in biology, On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. It’s that day!

Read More “How P.Z. Myers Does Science?” »

Atheism, Darwinism, Evolution

Posts navigation

1 2 … 15 Next

Recent Posts

  • Darwinism : Just Another Magic Show
  • Darwinian Evolution Means No Change Over Time
  • Review of The Reviews on Ham-Nye Debate
  • Ken Ham will debate Bill Nye. Why?
  • Darwin’s Other Doubt

Recent Comments

  • Darwinian Evolution Means No Change Over Time » Teleological Blog on Evidence for Design
  • teleologist on Review of The Reviews on Ham-Nye Debate
  • sosalty on Review of The Reviews on Ham-Nye Debate
  • The Anatomy of Darwinism (Part 2) » Teleological Blog on The Avalos’ Bash
  • teleologist on Review of The Reviews on Ham-Nye Debate

Archives

  • September 2016
  • February 2015
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • July 2013
  • January 2013
  • September 2012
  • May 2010
  • September 2009
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004

Categories

  • Atheism
  • Biology
  • blog specific issues
  • Creationism
  • Darwinism
  • Dstortions
  • Education
  • entertainment
  • Evolution
  • Holidays
  • Humor
  • Intelligent Design
  • Liberal-Humanism
  • OEC
  • Philosophy
  • Theology
  • Uncategorized
  • YEC

Meta

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Copyright © 2023 Teleological Blog.

Powered by PressBook WordPress theme